Second in a four-part series on BLIND BIASES 2 by Harry L. Strong
If you joined me for “Biases 1,” welcome back!
If you didn’t, you may be wondering: “So then, why should I keep reading?
Not a Problem. Let me “catch you up” in a hurry.
“People can’t see what they can’t see.” Brian D. McLaren
Author, activist, and public theologian Brian D. McLaren has created a remarkably helpful way of assisting us in understanding what makes us see things so differently from one another. McLaren has identified thirteen (13) biases that contribute to the way people view life and the world and lead them to such polarizing conclusions from one another. For our convenience, he has managed to categorize them, each beginning with the letter “C.”
Previously, we took a quick look at how McLaren labels Biases 1 through 5: Confirmation Bias; Complexity Bias; Community Bias; Complementarity Bias; & Competency Bias. In a moment we’ll consider Biases 6-9. I’ll choose one and tell you what I learned about myself as I considered my own reflection in my “Bias Mirror.” Then, if you so choose, you may do the same. Chances are, we’ll be much more charitable and effective in inviting another into a conversation about why we view a topic so differently if we’ve tried to remove our own “blinders” first.
A Conversation with Larry
But before I share with you Brian’s second set of Biases, let me tell you about a brief conversation I had with a neighbor last week. While I was out walking my dog, I ran into Larry who asked me what I’d been up to lately. I told him I was writing a series of articles about “Biases.” Can you guess what he said next? “I’m not biased or prejudiced about anything. I have my opinions and my perspectives, but I try to be as objective as possible about everything!”
I don’t think Larry is alone. I’m guessing most folks become defensive if someone insinuates they are biased or prejudiced. The conversation prompted me to come home and “ask Mr. Webster” [1} how he would define all four of Larry’s words. Here’s what I learned:
Bias: “a mental leaning or inclination; partiality; bent.”
Prejudice: “a judgment or opinion formed before the facts are known (or in disregard of facts that contradict it); preconceived idea, favorable, or, more usually, unfavorable; unreasonable bias.”
Opinion: “a belief not based on absolute certainty or positive knowledge but on what seems true, valid, or probable to one’s own mind.”
Perspective: “a specific point of view in understanding or judging things or events, especially one that shows them in their true relations to one another.”
Fascinating! I couldn’t help but notice the phrase “unreasonable bias” in the definition of prejudice. That would seem to suggest that there IS such a thing as “reasonable bias.” Granted, most of us, as we ponder our conclusions about life and the world, are far more comfortable with the less judgmental and less inflammatory terms “opinion” and “perspective.”
McLaren’s Biases Six through Nine
I’ve likely devoted far too much time to this little grammar-aside. Let’s invite Brian McLaren back to the lectern to tell us about Biases 6 through 9 that he has identified.
Consciousness Bias: Some things simply can’t be seen from where I am right now. But if I keep growing, maturing, and developing, someday I will be able to see what is now inaccessible to me.
Comfort or Complacency Bias: I prefer not to have my comfort disturbed.
Conservative/Liberal Bias: I lean toward nurturing fairness and kindness, or towards strictly enforcing purity, loyalty, liberty, and authority, as an expression of my political identity.
Confidence Bias: I am attracted to confidence, even if it is false. I often prefer the bold lie to the hesitant truth. 
I’m choosing to confess what I perceive to be the most potentially controversial and explosive bias of the four: Conservative/Liberal Bias. I concede, without apology, that I bring a “Liberal Bias” to my keyboard. Having said that, I want to underscore McLaren’s phrase “lean toward.” (Remember, Mr. Webster used the same term.) To quote my neighbor, Larry, in trying to be “as objective as possible,” the Conservative/Liberal Bias definition may seem to imply that if I champion fairness and kindness, I discount, purity, loyalty, liberty, and authority OR that if I focus my attention on purity, loyalty, liberty, and authority, I’m unfair and unkind! Remember, McLaren is about building bridges, not walls! He clarifies this point in Chapter 24 on Conservative/Liberal Bias, when he discusses how Jesus might have wrestled with this issue: “Jesus neither absolutized nor ignored the four primarily conservative moral values, but instead, he included them and integrated them with the values of fairness and kindness, or justice and compassion … all in service of love.”
It’s BOTH/AND – not EITHER/OR! Again, it’s “lean toward.” It’s a matter of “where do you put the accent?”
My Conservative/Liberal Bias
I spend a lot more time viewing CNN and MSNBC than I do watching Fox News or the 700 Club. I subscribe to Christian Century and Sojourners. I do not subscribe to Christianity Today or Christian Living. I realize that puts me at odds with a number of my sisters and brothers in the evangelical Christian community as well as those in the Republican Party. It also means that many of them have access to “opinions” and “perspectives” that I do not. If, bravely and vulnerably, we risk entering into a conversation with one another to try to build a bridge of understanding, I won’t say neither of us is “playing with a full deck,” but we definitely are not “playing with the same deck.”
Invitation to Lean Forward
If you’re willing and able to spend the time, would you please take one more look at those above Biases (Consciousness; Comfort or Complacency; Conservative/Liberal; and Confidence Bias) and then ask yourself: “Does that sound like me?” The next step is even harder. In quest of peace and understanding, would you be willing to share what you learned with someone you know who may not view the world quite the same way that you do?
If not, maybe one of McLaren’s “final four” Biases might be easier to address. Could we make a date to sit down together again in Blind Biases 3? Harry
 Webster’s New World College Dictionary: Third Edition; Macmillan USA, 1997.
 Brian McLaren, Why Don’t They Get It? Overcoming Bias in Others (and Yourself) (Self-published: 2019), e-book.
Regarding the Conservative/Liberal Bias definition contrasting fairness and kindness with purity, loyalty, liberty and authority, two thumbs way up for BOTH/AND – not EITHER/OR. It seems to me that loyalty to the concepts of fairness and kindness yields a liberty blessed by God while simultaneously supporting the type of authority Jesus modeled. As to purity, no such thing exists amongst humans, not even in our canonized brothers and sisters. We deceive ourselves if we claim it. Purity is God’s alone.
Sandra Pilmoor ________________________________
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi, Sandy. It hits me between the eyes. I’ve never found it more difficult to be civil. Thanks for taking the time to say “Thank you??” (😜
Sandra, thank you. I just sent a response that vanished. I think I get the “Thank you?” This is hard to practice.
Yes I understand!
Very interesting blog post. I recently participated in an online examination of Janet Givens’ book, LEAPFROG: How to Hold a Civil Conversation in an Uncivil Era. Your post today fits in nicely with that book and the group discussions we had. It is incredibly difficult to have a productive conversation today in our polarized nation. My conclusion after reading the book and taking part in the group is that unless both parties to the conversation bring a genuine desire to understand why the other person disagrees with them, the encounter won’t be productive. Those biases you speak of that we all bring to the table make it hard to see the other person’s point of view. The “L” in “LEAPFROG” stands for Listen. My liberal leanings make it more and more difficult for me to listen to what the other side thinks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Janet, thank you for sharing your LEAPFROG read and group experience. Might you consider writing a piece for Views from the Edge? I’d love it. Grace and Peace, Gordon
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll need to think about this, Gordon. In writing a full-length post on the subject might necessitate that I pull too much from Janet Givens’ book and steal her thunder. It might be better for us to approach Ms. Givens and ask if she’d be interested in writing a post for you. I know her well enough that I’d feel comfortable in initiating that. Any thoughts?
Hi, Janet, I’m writing this response after reading your wonderful proposal. It would be an honor to publish “Have we forgotten How to Listen?” on VFTE. As I said in this morning’s email, your piece stands well on its own two feet. I can’t imagine Ms. Givens exceeding it. It will go up on VFTE in the next several days.
Morning blessings, Gordon! Thanks for this, invitation to confront my comfortable bliss, and encouragement in that I am not alone! I recently left Trinity Episcopal of Excelsior simply saying it is too comfortable. What I really meant is below, learning and unlearning. Thank you for stepping into this space, to broaden us, invite us to BE aware and do something about our new awareness! Change challenges! Keep me on your list! Peace and joy, Hugs Chris Furlong
Sent from my iPad